White v. State

170 So. 700, 126 Fla. 232, 1936 Fla. LEXIS 1585
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedNovember 19, 1936
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 170 So. 700 (White v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
White v. State, 170 So. 700, 126 Fla. 232, 1936 Fla. LEXIS 1585 (Fla. 1936).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In this case Mr. Chief Justice Whitfield, Mr. Justice Ellis, and Mr. Justice Buford, are of the opinion that the judgment of the Circuit Court should be affirmed, while Mr. Justice Terrell, Mr. Justice Brown, and Mr. Justice Davis, are of the opinion that the said judgment should be reversed. When the members of the Supreme Court, sitting six members in a body and after full consultation it appears that the members' of the Court are permanently and equally divided in opinion as to whether the judgment should be affirmed or reversed, and there is no prospect of an immediate change in the personnel of the Court, the judgment should be affirmed; therefore, it is considered, ordered and adjudged under the authority of State, ex rel. Hampton, v. McClung, 47 Fla. 224, 37 Sou. Rep. 51, that the judgment of the Circuit Court in this cause be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, C. J., and Ellis, Terrell, Brown, Buford and Davis, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte: Chester White
178 So. 876 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1938)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
170 So. 700, 126 Fla. 232, 1936 Fla. LEXIS 1585, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/white-v-state-fla-1936.