White v. State Ex Rel. Fondren
This text of 163 So. 926 (White v. State Ex Rel. Fondren) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The writ of error presents no substantial error in the record sufficient to warrant reversal of the judgment, therefore the judgment should he and is hereby affirmed on the authority of the following decisions heretofore rendered in similar cases: City of Bradenton v. State, ex rel. Perry, 118 Fla. 838, 160 Sou. Rep. 506; State, ex rel. Suwannee River Bridge Co., v. Sholtz, 119 Fla. 701, 160 Sou. Rep. 872, and cases cited therein. See also: City of Kissimmee v. State, ex rel. Ben Hur Life Associa *432 tion, 121 Fla. 151, 163 Sou. Rep. 474, and State, ex rel. Crane, v. City of Lakeland, 116 Fla. 713, 156 Sou. Rep. 699, 157 Sou. Rep. 926.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
163 So. 926, 121 Fla. 431, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/white-v-state-ex-rel-fondren-fla-1935.