White v. State

151 So. 443, 227 Ala. 579, 1933 Ala. LEXIS 81
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedDecember 14, 1933
Docket1 Div. 756.
StatusPublished

This text of 151 So. 443 (White v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
White v. State, 151 So. 443, 227 Ala. 579, 1933 Ala. LEXIS 81 (Ala. 1933).

Opinion

ANDERSON, Chief Justice.

There is no bill of exceptions in this case, and no error appearing upon the record proper, the judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.

There was a motion for a change of venue which was overruled, but the action of the trial court cannot be reviewed as to this ruling in the absence of a bill of exceptions. Hawk v. State, 84 Ala. 6, 4 So. 283. It is sufficient to suggest, however, that a consideration of the affidavits incorporated in the record discloses a great weight against the defendant’s charge that he could not get a fair trial in Mobile county.

The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

All Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hawk v. State
84 Ala. 6 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1887)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
151 So. 443, 227 Ala. 579, 1933 Ala. LEXIS 81, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/white-v-state-ala-1933.