White v. State
114 Ala. 10
This text of 114 Ala. 10 (White v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
White v. State, 114 Ala. 10 (Ala. 1896).
Opinion
The city court erred in excluding from the jury proposed testimony going to show that the general character of State’s witness, Barnes, was bad. McCutchen v. Loggins, 109 Ala. 457, 465 ; Rhea v. State, 100 Ala. 119, 122, and cases there cited.
The other exceptions reserved on the trial are patently without merit.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Carter v. State
145 So. 814 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1933)
Fuller v. State
119 So. 594 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1929)
Mancil v. State
110 So. 320 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1926)
Murphy v. State
71 So. 967 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1916)
Collins v. State
58 So. 80 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1912)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
114 Ala. 10, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/white-v-state-ala-1896.