White v. Stafford

The Superior Court of New York City

White v. Stafford

55 N.Y. St. Rep. 216

CourtThe Superior Court of New York City

DecidedOctober 24, 1893

StatusPublished

This text of 55 N.Y. St. Rep. 216 (White v. Stafford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

White v. Stafford, 55 N.Y. St. Rep. 216 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1893).

Pincite

Opinion

Freedman, J.

A contested motion for injunctive relief during the pendency of the action is addressed largely to the discretion of the judge or court, upon all the facts as presented by the moving papers and opposing affidavits. Upon the motion in this case-the learned judge below, upon a consideration of all that was submitted and claimed by the respective parties, was justified in [217]*217withholding the relief prajrnd for, because the case was fairly brought within the rule that in case of doubt the plaintiff should be left to establish his right to injunctive relief, if he has any, by a regular trial of the issues. The appeal, therefore, fails tx> present a case for the disturbance of the exercise of the discretion by the judge below. The order should be affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

GrlLDERSLEEVE, J., concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Freedman, J.

A contested motion for injunctive relief during the pendency of the action is addressed largely to the discretion of the judge or court, upon all the facts as presented by the moving papers and opposing affidavits. Upon the motion in this case-the learned judge below, upon a consideration of all that was submitted and claimed by the respective parties, was justified in [217]*217withholding the relief prajrnd for, because the case was fairly brought within the rule that in case of doubt the plaintiff should be left to establish his right to injunctive relief, if he has any, by a regular trial of the issues. The appeal, therefore, fails tx> present a case for the disturbance of the exercise of the discretion by the judge below. The order should be affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

GrlLDERSLEEVE, J., concurs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

55 N.Y. St. Rep. 216, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/white-v-stafford-nysuperctnyc-1893.