White v. Spectaguard Acquisition, L.L.C.

233 S.W.3d 779, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1303, 2007 WL 2769516
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 25, 2007·No. ED 88983·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Arthur White (“Employee”) appeals the decision of the Labor and Relations Commission (the “Commission”), upholding the decision of the Appeals Tribunal of the Division of Employment Security, finding that White was discharged from Spectaguard Acquisition, L.L.C. (the “Employer”) due to misconduct and therefore, was disqualified from receiving unemployment benefits. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

White v. Spectaguard Acquisition, L.L.C., 233 S.W.3d 779, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1303, 2007 WL 2769516 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

233 S.W.3d 779 (White v. Spectaguard Acquisition, L.L.C.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Allen v. State
233 S.W.3d 779 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2007)