White v. Southard

72 S.E.2d 756, 236 N.C. 367, 1952 N.C. LEXIS 554
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided October 29, 1952·No. 305·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Deetoy, J.

The appellant contends that the appellee is not entitled to have the default judgment, entered 28 October, 1950, set aside, unless he shows excusable neglect and a meritorious defense as required by the provisions of G.S. 1-220. This contention is without merit. The provisions of G.S. 1-220 are inapplicable to the facts disclosed on this record.

A clerk of the Superior Court may, in proper cases, when no answer has been filed, enter a judgment by default final or default and inquiry as authorized by G.S. 1-211, 1-212 and 1-213. G.S. 1-214. However, when an answer has been filed, whether before or after the time for answering had expired, so long as it remains filed of record, the clerk is without authority to enter a judgment by default. Bailey v. Davis, 231 N.C. 86, 55 S.E. 2d 919; Cahoon v. Everton, 187 N.C. 369, 121 S.E. 612; Investment Co. v. Kelly, 123 N.C. 388, 31 S.E. 671. And when the clerk cannot determine whether an answer was filed before or after he signed a judgment by default, such judgment, upon proper motion in the cause, should be set aside.

The judgment below will be upheld.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

White v. Southard, 72 S.E.2d 756, 236 N.C. 367, 1952 N.C. LEXIS 554 (N.C. 1952).

72 S.E.2d 756 (White v. Southard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hayes v. Browne
331 S.E.2d 763 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1985)
North Carolina National Bank v. Virginia Carolina Builders, Inc.
292 S.E.2d 135 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1982)
Peebles v. Moore
275 S.E.2d 833 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1981)
Peebles v. Moore
269 S.E.2d 694 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1980)