White v. Sibley, Lindsay & Curr Co.

283 A.D. 1007, 130 N.Y.S.2d 603, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6099
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 20, 1954
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 283 A.D. 1007 (White v. Sibley, Lindsay & Curr Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
White v. Sibley, Lindsay & Curr Co., 283 A.D. 1007, 130 N.Y.S.2d 603, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6099 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1954).

Opinion

Order modified by adding to the last ordering paragraph the following: “except accident investigation records and claim records containing names and addresses of witnesses”, and as modified affirmed, without costs of this appeal to any party. Memorandum: Plaintiff’s complaint alleges that she [1008]*1008fell and was injured while leaving defendant’s store; that, among other things, the defendant was negligent in that the steps and exit doors were negligently constructed and maintained, so as to constitute a trap and dangerous condition. The order appealed from permits an examination before trial as to “All previous accidents in which any persons fell or sustained any injuries by falling prior to the 11th day of January, 1952, at that portion of the premises above designated.” The appellant contends that the order should be modified so as to limit the examination to prior accidents occurring “ under the same or similar circumstances.” While it is true that evidence upon the trial must be confined to accidents occurring under the same or similar circumstances, it is the trial court which eventually determines the competency of the evidence offered. We conclude that under the circumstances we should not disturb the discretion of the Special Term. We conclude also that the last ordering paragraph providing for the production of books and papers should be modified by excepting therefrom accident investigation records and claim records containing names and addresses of witnesses. All concur. (Appeal from an order granting plaintiffs’ motion for an examination before trial and for a discovery and inspection.) Present — McCurn, P. J., Vaughan, Kimball, Piper and Wheeler, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sanfilipo v. Baptist Temple, Inc.
52 Misc. 2d 767 (New York Supreme Court, 1967)
Maiden v. Aid Carpet Service, Inc.
43 Misc. 2d 660 (New York Supreme Court, 1964)
Ossandon v. New York City Transit Authority
44 Misc. 2d 189 (New York Supreme Court, 1964)
Scheer v. City of Syracuse
41 Misc. 2d 1060 (New York Supreme Court, 1964)
Wollen v. B. R. Dewitt, Inc.
20 Misc. 2d 109 (New York Supreme Court, 1959)
De Vito v. New York Central Railroad
32 Misc. 2d 494 (New York Supreme Court, 1955)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
283 A.D. 1007, 130 N.Y.S.2d 603, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6099, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/white-v-sibley-lindsay-curr-co-nyappdiv-1954.