White v. Shulman

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

White v. Shulman

90 N.E.2d 315, 325 Mass. 759

CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

DecidedFebruary 1, 1950

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 90 N.E.2d 315 (White v. Shulman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

White v. Shulman, 90 N.E.2d 315, 325 Mass. 759 (Mass. 1950).

Pincite

Opinion

Order sustaining demurrer affirmed. None of the counts in the plaintiffs’ declaration as a whole complies with the requirements of G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 231, § 7, Second, that “The declaration shall state concisely and with substantial certainty the substantive facts necessary to constitute the cause of action.” Pollock v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co. 289 Mass. 255, 258. Jacobs v. Mann, 300 Mass. 258, 259-260. Fleming v. Dane, 304 Mass. 46, 51. See Keljikian v. Star Brewing Co. 303 Mass. 53.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order sustaining demurrer affirmed. None of the counts in the plaintiffs’ declaration as a whole complies with the requirements of G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 231, § 7, Second, that “The declaration shall state concisely and with substantial certainty the substantive facts necessary to constitute the cause of action.” Pollock v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co. 289 Mass. 255, 258. Jacobs v. Mann, 300 Mass. 258, 259-260. Fleming v. Dane, 304 Mass. 46, 51. See Keljikian v. Star Brewing Co. 303 Mass. 53.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

90 N.E.2d 315, 325 Mass. 759, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/white-v-shulman-mass-1950.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack