White v. Shulman
90 N.E.2d 315, 325 Mass. 759
Opinion
Order sustaining demurrer affirmed. None of the counts in the plaintiffs’ declaration as a whole complies with the requirements of G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 231, § 7, Second, that “The declaration shall state concisely and with substantial certainty the substantive facts necessary to constitute the cause of action.” Pollock v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co. 289 Mass. 255, 258. Jacobs v. Mann, 300 Mass. 258, 259-260. Fleming v. Dane, 304 Mass. 46, 51. See Keljikian v. Star Brewing Co. 303 Mass. 53.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
White v. Shulman, 90 N.E.2d 315, 325 Mass. 759 (Mass. 1950).
90 N.E.2d 315 (White v. Shulman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Jet Construction Co. v. C. C. Whitten, Inc.
54 Mass. App. Dec. 153 (Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div., 1974)
De Sa v. Sniger
309 N.E.2d 503 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1974)