White v. Seely

1 Utah 191
CourtUtah Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 15, 1875
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 1 Utah 191 (White v. Seely) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Utah Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
White v. Seely, 1 Utah 191 (Utah 1875).

Opinion

Boreman, J.,

delivered the opinion of the Court.

This is a suit originally brought in the. District Court tor $111.05. The Defendant demurred to the complaint upon the ground that the District Court had no jurisdiction to render judgment for that sum. The demurrer was overruled; and to reverse this judgment of the Court below, overruling the demurrer, the Defendant appeals to this Court.

There is, perhaps, no disagreement among the members of this Court as to whether the District Court had jurisdiction to render judgment for the sum sued for, yet as the order of the Court overruling a demurrer is not an appealable order, this Court does not have jurisdiction to decide the case, and consent of parties cannot give such jurisdiction.

The appeal should be dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Conant v. Deep Creek & Curlew Valley Irrigation Co.
66 P. 188 (Utah Supreme Court, 1901)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Utah 191, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/white-v-seely-utah-1875.