White v. Sanders

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

White v. Sanders

32 Me. 188

CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine

DecidedJuly 1, 1850

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 32 Me. 188 (White v. Sanders) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

White v. Sanders, 32 Me. 188 (Me. 1850).

Pincite

Opinion

Tenney, J.,

orally.—The instruction as to the demand was correct.

The defendants’ counsel requested certain instructions. But the mere knowledge by the plaintiffs of the sale to the defendants, and their receipt from Getchell of money on account of the goods, would not necessarily be a ratification. The modi[190]*190fication of requested instruction was rightfully made by the Judge. Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tenney, J.,

orally.—The instruction as to the demand was correct.

The defendants’ counsel requested certain instructions. But the mere knowledge by the plaintiffs of the sale to the defendants, and their receipt from Getchell of money on account of the goods, would not necessarily be a ratification. The modi[190]*190fication of requested instruction was rightfully made by the Judge. Exceptions overruled.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

32 Me. 188, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/white-v-sanders-me-1850.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack