White v. Rucker
This text of 132 S.E.2d 327 (White v. Rucker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The crucial (factual) questions were for determination by the jury. We find nothing sufficient to indicate the jury failed to understand and apply the pertinent principles of law.
We have considered each of plaintiff’s thirty-eight assignments of error. Conceding technical error in certain respects, a careful review [228]*228of the evidence amd icbiatnge leaves tlhe impression, .tibere wats no: error isufficienf to 'amount to a denial .of a substantial right or to. oonstitute ■a sound basils for lawardáng a new trial.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
132 S.E.2d 327, 260 N.C. 226, 1963 N.C. LEXIS 659, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/white-v-rucker-nc-1963.