White v. Rucker
132 S.E.2d 327, 260 N.C. 226, 1963 N.C. LEXIS 659
Opinion
The crucial (factual) questions were for determination by the jury. We find nothing sufficient to indicate the jury failed to understand and apply the pertinent principles of law.
We have considered each of plaintiff’s thirty-eight assignments of error. Conceding technical error in certain respects, a careful review [228] of the evidence amd icbiatnge leaves tlhe impression, .tibere wats no: error isufficienf to 'amount to a denial .of a substantial right or to. oonstitute ■a sound basils for lawardáng a new trial.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
White v. Rucker, 132 S.E.2d 327, 260 N.C. 226, 1963 N.C. LEXIS 659 (N.C. 1963).
132 S.E.2d 327 (White v. Rucker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Curry v. Case
257 So. 2d 610 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1972)