White v. Rhein
This text of 25 Misc. 794 (White v. Rhein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We think that the order appealed from should be reversed. If affirmed it would work perhaps irreparable harm to the plaintiff, while its reversal would do no injury to the defendants in view of the fact that plaintiff has filed a sufficient Undertaking to' pay costs, which was filed at the time of the making of the motions upon which the order appealed from is based. It follows that the judgment entered upon said order must be reversed. Order appealed from and judgment reversed, no costs.
Present: Fitzsimohs, Oh. J., Oohlah and O’Dwyeb, JJ.
Judgment and order reversed, no costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
25 Misc. 794, 54 N.Y.S. 1118, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/white-v-rhein-nynyccityct-1898.