White v. Purchasing Support, Inc.
This text of 249 A.D.2d 991 (White v. Purchasing Support, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: We affirm for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court (Howe, J.). We add only that there is no merit to defendants’ contention that the oral agreement entitling plaintiff to commissions earned during his employment is barred by the Statute of Frauds (see, Dickenson v Dickenson Agency, 127 AD2d 983, 984; see also, Cron v Hargro Fabrics, 91 NY2d 362). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Howe, J. — Summary Judgment.) Present — Pine, J. P., Lawton, Wisner, Balio and Boehm, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
249 A.D.2d 991, 671 N.Y.S.2d 384, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5165, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/white-v-purchasing-support-inc-nyappdiv-1998.