White v. Purchasing Support, Inc.

249 A.D.2d 991, 671 N.Y.S.2d 384, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5165
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 29, 1998·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: We affirm for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court (Howe, J.). We add only that there is no merit to defendants’ contention that the oral agreement entitling plaintiff to commissions earned during his employment is barred by the Statute of Frauds (see, Dickenson v Dickenson Agency, 127 AD2d 983, 984; see also, Cron v Hargro Fabrics, 91 NY2d 362). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Howe, J. — Summary Judgment.) Present — Pine, J. P., Lawton, Wisner, Balio and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

White v. Purchasing Support, Inc., 249 A.D.2d 991, 671 N.Y.S.2d 384, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5165 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

249 A.D.2d 991 (White v. Purchasing Support, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kieper v. The Fusco Group Partners Inc.
2017 NY Slip Op 5782 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)