White v. Pruneau

Missouri Court of Appeals

White v. Pruneau

913 S.W.2d 959, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 108, 1996 WL 23620

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 23, 1996

DocketNo. 67803

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 913 S.W.2d 959 (White v. Pruneau) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

White v. Pruneau, 913 S.W.2d 959, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 108, 1996 WL 23620 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

CRANDALL, Judge.

Plaintiff, Louis Timothy White, appeals the dismissal of his action for bodily injuries against defendant, Stephanie A. Pruneau. We dismiss the appeal.

Plaintiff brought this action seeking damages for bodily injuries resulting from a motor vehicle accident. The trial court granted defendant’s motion for sanctions against plaintiff for failing to attend his scheduled depositions. The court dismissed plaintiffs petition without prejudice and assessed attorney fees, court reporter fees and court costs against plaintiff. This appeal followed.

Though not raised by the parties, we are obligated to notice, sua sponte, matters preventing us from obtaining jurisdiction. Committee for Educ. Equality v. State, 878 S.W.2d 446, 451 (Mo. banc 1994). Here, the trial court specifically dismissed the petition “without prejudice.” The well-established rule is that a dismissal without prejudice is not a final judgment. Waltrip v. Davis, 899 S.W.2d 147, 148 (MoApp.E.D. 1995). Generally, a dismissal without prejudice is not an adjudication on the merits. Id. Unless otherwise barred, such a dismissal allows the party to re-file the action. Id. See also Rule 67.03. No appeal will lie when there is no final judgment entered. Waltrip v. Davis, 899 S.W.2d at 148.

We therefore dismiss the appeal.

CRAHAN, P.J. and DOWD, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CRANDALL, Judge.

Plaintiff, Louis Timothy White, appeals the dismissal of his action for bodily injuries against defendant, Stephanie A. Pruneau. We dismiss the appeal.

Plaintiff brought this action seeking damages for bodily injuries resulting from a motor vehicle accident. The trial court granted defendant’s motion for sanctions against plaintiff for failing to attend his scheduled depositions. The court dismissed plaintiffs petition without prejudice and assessed attorney fees, court reporter fees and court costs against plaintiff. This appeal followed.

Though not raised by the parties, we are obligated to notice, sua sponte, matters preventing us from obtaining jurisdiction. Committee for Educ. Equality v. State, 878 S.W.2d 446, 451 (Mo. banc 1994). Here, the trial court specifically dismissed the petition “without prejudice.” The well-established rule is that a dismissal without prejudice is not a final judgment. Waltrip v. Davis, 899 S.W.2d 147, 148 (MoApp.E.D. 1995). Generally, a dismissal without prejudice is not an adjudication on the merits. Id. Unless otherwise barred, such a dismissal allows the party to re-file the action. Id. See also Rule 67.03. No appeal will lie when there is no final judgment entered. Waltrip v. Davis, 899 S.W.2d at 148.

We therefore dismiss the appeal.

CRAHAN, P.J. and DOWD, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

913 S.W.2d 959, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 108, 1996 WL 23620, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/white-v-pruneau-moctapp-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack