White v. Prospect Heights Hospital

278 A.D. 789, 103 N.Y.S.2d 859, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4745

This text of 278 A.D. 789 (White v. Prospect Heights Hospital) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
White v. Prospect Heights Hospital, 278 A.D. 789, 103 N.Y.S.2d 859, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4745 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1951).

Opinion

The appellant was a paying patient in respondent hospital, which had been incorporated for charitable purposes. The surgery for which he had been admitted was successfully performed by his private surgeon. The jury could have found, upon the evidence adduced, that following the operation it became necessary to eatheterize appellant; that he was eatheterized several times, the first time by an orderly in the employ of the hospital who was not a medical graduate; that the catheterization by the orderly was in accordance with general custom at this hospital; and that appellant received severe injuries as a result of the first catheterization. The fact that a given hospital is a charitable institution does not render it immune from liability to a beneficiary for personal harm caused by reason of negligence. (Sheehan v. North Country Community [790]*790Hosp., 273 1ST. Y. 163; Dillon V. Bockaway Beach Hosp., 284 N. Y. 176; Gordon V. Harbor Hosp., 275 App. Div. 1047.) Although it has been held that a hospital is not liable for medical acts performed, on the theory that the undertaking to heal is not that of the hospital but rather that of the individual actor (Dillon v. Bockaway Beach Hosp., supra; Phillips v. Buffalo Gen. Hosp., 239 N. Y. 188), that doctrine should not he extended so as to relieve a hospital from negligence in permitting employees to perform medical acts for which they have no competence. (Cf. Howe v. Medical Arts Center Hosp., 261 App. Div. 1088, affd. 287 N. Y. 698; Boewekamp v. New York PostGraduate Medical School & Hosp., 256 App. Div. 957, affd. 283 N. Y. 585, and Hendrickson v. Hodkin, 276 Ñ. Y. 252.) Judgment dismissing the complaint on the merits, after trial before the court and a jury, reversed on the law and the facts and a new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event. Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Sneed and-Wenzel, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Howe v. Medical Arts Center Hospital
39 N.E.2d 303 (New York Court of Appeals, 1942)
Dillon v. Rockaway Beach Hospital & Dispensary
30 N.E.2d 373 (New York Court of Appeals, 1940)
Phillips v. Buffalo General Hospital
146 N.E. 199 (New York Court of Appeals, 1924)
Roewekamp v. New York Post-Graduate Medical School & Hospital
27 N.E.2d 442 (New York Court of Appeals, 1940)
Roewekamp v. New York Post-Graduate Medical School & Hospital
256 A.D. 957 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1939)
Howe v. Medical Arts Center Hospital
261 A.D. 1088 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1941)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
278 A.D. 789, 103 N.Y.S.2d 859, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4745, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/white-v-prospect-heights-hospital-nyappdiv-1951.