White v. Proctor & Gamble

839 So. 2d 49, 2003 La. LEXIS 718, 2003 WL 1524487
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedMarch 14, 2003
DocketNo. 2003-C-0026
StatusPublished

This text of 839 So. 2d 49 (White v. Proctor & Gamble) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
White v. Proctor & Gamble, 839 So. 2d 49, 2003 La. LEXIS 718, 2003 WL 1524487 (La. 2003).

Opinion

In re Procter & Gamble et al.; Gastrointestinal Specialists, A.M.C.; Louisiana Research Center L.L.C.; Provenza, Mark Dr.; — Defendant(s); Applying for Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court Div. A, No. 457,032; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 36,502-CA.

Denied.

VICTORY, J., would grant the writ. TRAYLOR, J., would grant the writ. WEIMER, J., would grant the writ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
839 So. 2d 49, 2003 La. LEXIS 718, 2003 WL 1524487, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/white-v-proctor-gamble-la-2003.