White v. Potter
1 N.J.L. 183
Opinion
This is a sufficient acknowledgment of the debt to take the ease out of the statute of limitations; the non-suit was erroneously directed, and must be set aside.
Note — See Dean v. Pitts, 10 Johns. 35.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
White v. Potter, 1 N.J.L. 183 (N.J. 1793).
1 N.J.L. 183 (White v. Potter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Dean v. Pitts
10 Johns. 35 (New York Supreme Court, 1813)