White v. Porter

78 S.W.2d 287
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided December 12, 1934·No. No. 4721·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinions

LEVY, Justice.

The appellees have filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, contending that since the school term for which the contract was made has expired, that the questions involved have become moot.

The particular controversy here involves the rights of Miss White in the matter of collecting her salary due in payment for her services in teaching the school under a valid and enforeeáble contract, specifying amount of agreed upon compensation. Her rights and adjudication thereupon do not cease with the school term, but depend entirely upon judgment of the court. The enforcement of the judgment in all its terms and direetion.iegally exists upon its rendition and at the time of its rendition and against the school officials, presently and their successors in office. A mandamus runs against officials and not parties in individual capacity.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

White v. Porter, 78 S.W.2d 287 (Tex. Ct. App. 1934).

78 S.W.2d 287 (White v. Porter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Michael Andrew Carman v. Kristi Michelle Carman
Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 2012
Oliphint v. Rigsby
244 S.W.2d 293 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1951)
Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Texas Attorney General Reports, 1951
Peevy v. Carlisle
139 S.W.2d 779 (Texas Supreme Court, 1940)
Carlile v. Peevy
138 S.W.2d 233 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1940)
Carver v. Gray
140 S.W.2d 227 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1940)
Isbill v. Stovall
92 S.W.2d 1067 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1936)