White v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.
79 A. 982, 231 Pa. 93, 1911 Pa. LEXIS 798
Opinion
The right to a recovery in this case, depended on whether the plaintiff, who was injured, was thrown by the starting of a car, as she was in the act of alighting, or whether she stepped from the car when it was in motion. This was a question of fact for the jury, and it was properly submitted.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
White v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co., 79 A. 982, 231 Pa. 93, 1911 Pa. LEXIS 798 (Pa. 1911).
79 A. 982 (White v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Jenkins Et Ux. v. Beyer (Et Al.)
180 A. 135 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1935)