White v. Patnik

99 So. 3d 521, 2011 WL 2586603, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 10398
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 1, 2011
DocketNo. 3D10-1789
StatusPublished

This text of 99 So. 3d 521 (White v. Patnik) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
White v. Patnik, 99 So. 3d 521, 2011 WL 2586603, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 10398 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment of injunction for protection against repeat violence as there is no error in the record to merit a rever[522]*522sal. Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla.1979).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee
377 So. 2d 1150 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
99 So. 3d 521, 2011 WL 2586603, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 10398, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/white-v-patnik-fladistctapp-2011.