White v. Osserman
139 A. 761, 16 Del. Ch. 39, 1927 Del. Ch. LEXIS 43
This text of 139 A. 761 (White v. Osserman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Chancery of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
White v. Osserman, 139 A. 761, 16 Del. Ch. 39, 1927 Del. Ch. LEXIS 43 (Del. Ct. App. 1927).
Opinion
The demurrer will be sustained on the ground that the complainants have an adequate and complete remedy at law. In a case where the circumstances were similar, the Superior Court of this state held that the defendant in the judgment might obtain appropriate relief in that court. In re Vandenburg, 31 Del. (1 W. W. Harr.) 192, 112 A. 830.
Order accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Smulski v. H. Feinberg Furniture Co.
193 A. 585 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1937)
Arcturus Radio Tube Co. v. Radio Corp. of America
177 A. 899 (Court of Chancery of Delaware, 1935)
Gray Co. v. Alemite Corp.
174 A. 136 (Court of Chancery of Delaware, 1934)
Pefkaros v. Harman
174 A. 124 (Court of Chancery of Delaware, 1934)
Tweed v. Lockton
167 A. 703 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1932)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
139 A. 761, 16 Del. Ch. 39, 1927 Del. Ch. LEXIS 43, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/white-v-osserman-delch-1927.