White v. Noland

96 S.E.2d 598, 213 Ga. 19, 1957 Ga. LEXIS 282
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 11, 1957
Docket19577
StatusPublished

This text of 96 S.E.2d 598 (White v. Noland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
White v. Noland, 96 S.E.2d 598, 213 Ga. 19, 1957 Ga. LEXIS 282 (Ga. 1957).

Opinion

Head, Justice.

The bill of exceptions recites that the cause is brought to this court because it “involves a constitutional question.” If any decision is required on a constitutional question, as alleged, it would involve only the application in a general sense of an unquestioned and unambiguous provision of the Constitution to a given state of facts. The Court of Appeals, and not the Supreme Court, therefore, has jurisdiction of the writ of error. Giles v. State, 212 Ga. 465 (93 S. E. 2d 739), and citations.

Transferred to the Court of Appeals.

All the Justices concur. Robert J. Noland, Solicitor-General, James I. Parker, Assistant Solicitor-General, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Giles v. State
93 S.E.2d 739 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1956)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
96 S.E.2d 598, 213 Ga. 19, 1957 Ga. LEXIS 282, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/white-v-noland-ga-1957.