White v. Miller

Court of Appeals of Texas

White v. Miller

103 S.W.2d 1075

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

DecidedDecember 3, 1936

DocketNo. 3449

StatusPublished

This text of 103 S.W.2d 1075 (White v. Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

White v. Miller, 103 S.W.2d 1075 (Tex. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

WALTHALL, Justice.

This is an appeal from an order overruling a plea of privilege. The case is companion to G. R. White et al. v. C. M. Houston, 103 S.W.(2d) 1073, this day decided. For the reasons stated in the opinion in the companion case, the judgment should be affirmed. There are some differences in the facts shown in the present case but such differences strengthen the view that the notes sued upon and which are payable at Stanton are valid obligations of the partnership of White & Tom.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WALTHALL, Justice.

This is an appeal from an order overruling a plea of privilege. The case is companion to G. R. White et al. v. C. M. Houston, 103 S.W.(2d) 1073, this day decided. For the reasons stated in the opinion in the companion case, the judgment should be affirmed. There are some differences in the facts shown in the present case but such differences strengthen the view that the notes sued upon and which are payable at Stanton are valid obligations of the partnership of White & Tom.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

103 S.W.2d 1075, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/white-v-miller-texapp-1936.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack