White v. Mhatre

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

White v. Mhatre

291 A.D.2d 466, 741 N.Y.S.2d 416, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2093

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 14, 2002

StatusPublished

This text of 291 A.D.2d 466 (White v. Mhatre) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

White v. Mhatre, 291 A.D.2d 466, 741 N.Y.S.2d 416, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2093 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

—Motion by the respondents for reargument of an [467]*467appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated September 14, 1999, which was determined by decision and order of this Court dated May 21, 2001.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is ordered that the motion is granted, and upon reargument, the decision and order of this Court dated May 21, 2001 is amended by adding to the decretal paragraph, after the words “Dolen Corporation,” the phrase “and against the defendant Shanti Mhatre on the cross claims of the defendants Thomas Chase and Dolan Corporation.” Santucci, J.P., Altman, Florio and Luciano, JJ., concur. [See, 283 AD2d 573.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Motion by the respondents for reargument of an [467]*467appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated September 14, 1999, which was determined by decision and order of this Court dated May 21, 2001.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is ordered that the motion is granted, and upon reargument, the decision and order of this Court dated May 21, 2001 is amended by adding to the decretal paragraph, after the words “Dolen Corporation,” the phrase “and against the defendant Shanti Mhatre on the cross claims of the defendants Thomas Chase and Dolan Corporation.” Santucci, J.P., Altman, Florio and Luciano, JJ., concur. [See, 283 AD2d 573.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

291 A.D.2d 466, 741 N.Y.S.2d 416, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2093, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/white-v-mhatre-nyappdiv-2002.