White v. Marion Criminal Court

84 N.E.2d 588, 227 Ind. 167, 1949 Ind. LEXIS 122
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided March 25, 1949·No. No. 28,541.·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The petitioner was convicted of second degree burglary, which judgment was affirmed by this court on June 10, 1948. White v. State (1948), 226 Ind. 309, 79 N. E. 2d 771. In that appeal we examined the evidence and found that the verdict was sustained by sufficient evidence and not contrary to law.

The petition in this original action has been designated as one for a writ of mandamus. Apparently it was drafted without aid of counsel, and in many respects it is unintelligible. The petition is not brought in the name of the State of Indiana on his relation, which is a mandatory requirement for mandamus. State ex rel. Rogers v. Youngblood (1948), 226 Ind. 645, 78 N. E. 2d 663. It fails to allege that he has any action or proceedings commenced in the trial court for a writ of error coram nobis, since there is no averment that any notice was ever served upon the Attorney General. Section 49-1937, Burns’ 1933 (1947 Supp.). Lester v. Grant Circuit Court (1948), 226 Ind. 186, 78 N. E. 2d 785. No breach of any duty by the trial court *169 has been alleged. No cause has been shown for the issuance of a writ.

Petition denied.

Note.—Reported in 84 N. E. 2d 5$8.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

White v. Marion Criminal Court, 84 N.E.2d 588, 227 Ind. 167, 1949 Ind. LEXIS 122 (Ind. 1949).

84 N.E.2d 588 (White v. Marion Criminal Court) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Warmouth v. Owen
97 N.E.2d 866 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1951)
State Ex Rel. Bramlett v. LaPorte Superior Court
95 N.E.2d 631 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1950)
State Ex Rel. Sanders v. Reeves
91 N.E.2d 912 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1950)
City of East Chicago v. State Ex Rel. Pitzer
84 N.E.2d 588 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1949)