White v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

White v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority

133 A.D.2d 583, 519 N.Y.S.2d 946, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51613

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 22, 1987

StatusPublished

This text of 133 A.D.2d 583 (White v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

White v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority, 133 A.D.2d 583, 519 N.Y.S.2d 946, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51613 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

— Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Shirley Fingerhood, J.), entered on or about August 19, 1986 which set aside a verdict in favor of plaintiff in the amount of $1 million and ordered a new trial solely on the issue of damages, unanimously modified, on the law, the facts and in the exercise of discretion, to permit plaintiff to consent to a reduced award of $400,000 and to the entry of a judgment in that amount, within 10 days after service of this court’s order, with notice of entry, upon his attorney, and otherwise affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

In the event of plaintiff’s failure to so consent, the order appealed from is affirmed in its entirety, without costs or disbursements. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Ross, Milonas, Kassal and Ellerin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Shirley Fingerhood, J.), entered on or about August 19, 1986 which set aside a verdict in favor of plaintiff in the amount of $1 million and ordered a new trial solely on the issue of damages, unanimously modified, on the law, the facts and in the exercise of discretion, to permit plaintiff to consent to a reduced award of $400,000 and to the entry of a judgment in that amount, within 10 days after service of this court’s order, with notice of entry, upon his attorney, and otherwise affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

In the event of plaintiff’s failure to so consent, the order appealed from is affirmed in its entirety, without costs or disbursements. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Ross, Milonas, Kassal and Ellerin, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

133 A.D.2d 583, 519 N.Y.S.2d 946, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51613, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/white-v-manhattan-bronx-surface-transit-operating-authority-nyappdiv-1987.