White v. Lefoldt

78 Miss. 173
Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided October 15, 1900·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Calhoon, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

We know no statute, nor common law principle, nor adjudication in law or equity, nor sound reason which would, by any stretch, authorize or-justify a court of equity, without express consent of the parties, in including in a decree of sale for partition of property owned in common other property owned exclusively by one of the parties. Partition of land must be between “joint tenants, tenants in common, or coparceners” (code 1892, § 3097); and so of personalty (Id., §§3120, 3121). The action of the court below is affirmed, and the cause remanded for such procedure as may be desired and proper in reference to the land, exclusive of the house on it, which is the personal property of Mrs. White.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

White v. Lefoldt, 78 Miss. 173 (Mich. 1900).

78 Miss. 173 (White v. Lefoldt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coers v. Williams
74 So. 2d 836 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1954)
Heintz v. Wilhelm
186 N.W. 305 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1922)
Forest Product & Mfg. Co. v. Buckley
66 So. 279 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1914)