White v. Lacy

Supreme Court of New Jersey

White v. Lacy

3 N.J.L. 899

DecidedNovember 15, 1811

StatusPublished

This text of 3 N.J.L. 899 (White v. Lacy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

White v. Lacy, 3 N.J.L. 899 (N.J. 1811).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court.

The affidavit contains all the requisites set out in the 40th section of the justice’s act, and was duly filed, according to the direction of that section. There was no necessity for two affidavits to the same fact; we are all of opinion, that the plaintiff would have been entitled to costs in the Common Pleas, had the cause been decided there; and that he cannot be in a worse condition by the defendant’s moving the cause to this court.

Eull costs ordered to be taxed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court.

The affidavit contains all the requisites set out in the 40th section of the justice’s act, and was duly filed, according to the direction of that section. There was no necessity for two affidavits to the same fact; we are all of opinion, that the plaintiff would have been entitled to costs in the Common Pleas, had the cause been decided there; and that he cannot be in a worse condition by the defendant’s moving the cause to this court.

Eull costs ordered to be taxed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 N.J.L. 899, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/white-v-lacy-nj-1811.