White v. Kroezer

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

White v. Kroezer

1919 OK 381, 186 P. 478, 77 Okla. 48, 1919 Okla. LEXIS 247

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedDecember 23, 1919

Docket9144

StatusPublished

This text of 1919 OK 381 (White v. Kroezer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

White v. Kroezer, 1919 OK 381, 186 P. 478, 77 Okla. 48, 1919 Okla. LEXIS 247 (Okla. 1919).

Pincite

Opinion

MicNEILL, J.

This was an. action instituted by A. B. White against Louise Kroeger and George Kroeger and the Citizens Bank of Billings, to recover possession of an oil and gas lease. On the trial of the case, the evidence in case No. 8942, being White v. Kroe-ger, ante (opinion filed Dec. 23, 1919), was by agreement the evidence submitted in this case. The court below found the issues in favor of the defendants Kroeger and against the plaintiff, White. The case has been submitted here upon the same briefs. The decision in the case of White v. Kroeger, No. 8942, supra, is decisive in this case, and the opinion in the former case will be adopted as the opinion in this case.

For the reasons stated, the judgment of the lower court will be affirmed.

OWEN, C. J., and KANE, JOHNSON, HIGGINS, and BAILEY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MicNEILL, J.

This was an. action instituted by A. B. White against Louise Kroeger and George Kroeger and the Citizens Bank of Billings, to recover possession of an oil and gas lease. On the trial of the case, the evidence in case No. 8942, being White v. Kroe-ger, ante (opinion filed Dec. 23, 1919), was by agreement the evidence submitted in this case. The court below found the issues in favor of the defendants Kroeger and against the plaintiff, White. The case has been submitted here upon the same briefs. The decision in the case of White v. Kroeger, No. 8942, supra, is decisive in this case, and the opinion in the former case will be adopted as the opinion in this case.

For the reasons stated, the judgment of the lower court will be affirmed.

OWEN, C. J., and KANE, JOHNSON, HIGGINS, and BAILEY, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1919 OK 381, 186 P. 478, 77 Okla. 48, 1919 Okla. LEXIS 247, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/white-v-kroezer-okla-1919.