White v. Knickerbocker Ice Co.
This text of 229 A.D. 746 (White v. Knickerbocker Ice Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Young, Hagarty and Scudder. JJ . concur; Lazansky, P. J., and Carswell, J., dissent and vote for reversal and a dismissal of the complaint on the merits, upon the ground that the deed dated May 1, 1841, from William Smith to George P. Felter, in which part of the description is: “ thence running northerly along the land of said Garret Henion to the Rockland Lake thence westerly along the south side oí the Rockland Lake to the land of the heirs of John Smith deceased,” conveyed to said Felter. the predecessor in title of the Knickerbocker Ice Company, the lands under water in dispute here (Gouverneur v. N. 1. Co., 134 N. Y. 355; Fulton L., H. & P. Co. v. State of N. Y., 200 id. 400), and that defendants have made out a case of adverse possession, of abandonment of the easement and of estoppel by reason of the attitude of the plaintiff to defendants Ellwood M. Rabenold and Rockland Lake Corporation, even if plaintiff or her predecessor had an easement by way of necessity.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
229 A.D. 746, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/white-v-knickerbocker-ice-co-nyappdiv-1930.