White v. Klinken
16 Abb. Pr. 109
Opinion
We are all of opinion that the order staying the plaintiff’s proceedings prevented the giving notice of the judgment, and that such notice was a nullity. The defendant’s time to appeal has not been limited, and the motion to dismiss must be denied, but without costs.
Present, Sutherland, P. J., Barnard and Ceerke, JJ,
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
White v. Klinken, 16 Abb. Pr. 109 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1863).
16 Abb. Pr. 109 (White v. Klinken) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Schwehm v. Hinberg
63 Misc. 525 (New York Supreme Court, 1909)
Gersman v. Levy
57 Misc. 156 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1907)
Troy Carriage Works v. Muxlow
16 Misc. 561 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1896)
Kerner v. Steck
9 N.Y.S. 303 (Superior Court of Buffalo, 1890)
Ansonia Brass & Copper Co. v. Conner
11 Daly 326 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1883)
Romaine v. Cornwell
11 Abb. Pr. 430 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1871)