White v. Kemble

Supreme Court of New Jersey

White v. Kemble

3 N.J.L. 460

DecidedNovember 15, 1808

StatusPublished

This text of 3 N.J.L. 460 (White v. Kemble) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

White v. Kemble, 3 N.J.L. 460 (N.J. 1808).

Pincite

Opinion

ON CERTIORARI.

Report of referees after the time limited, is void.

The cause below, while pending in the justice’s court, had been submitted, by consent of the parties and rule of the court, to referees, who in said rule were directed to report in a limited time; the referees, after the expiration of the time limited in the rule of reference, reported; on which report the justice entered judgment; and this being assigned for error, the court

Reversed the judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON CERTIORARI.

Report of referees after the time limited, is void.

The cause below, while pending in the justice’s court, had been submitted, by consent of the parties and rule of the court, to referees, who in said rule were directed to report in a limited time; the referees, after the expiration of the time limited in the rule of reference, reported; on which report the justice entered judgment; and this being assigned for error, the court

Reversed the judgment.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 N.J.L. 460, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/white-v-kemble-nj-1808.