White v. Keesler Federal Credit Union

S.D. Mississippi

White v. Keesler Federal Credit Union

DecidedFebruary 17, 2023

Docket1:21-cv-00190

StatusUnknown

This text of White v. Keesler Federal Credit Union (White v. Keesler Federal Credit Union) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. Mississippi primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

White v. Keesler Federal Credit Union, (S.D. Miss. 2023).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FORT THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION

EUGENIA WHITE PLAINTIFF

v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:21-cv-190-TBM-RPM

KEESLER FEDERAL CREDIT UNION DEFENDANT

ORDER Now before the Court is the Plaintiff’s Motion to Seal and to Strike [37] certain documents attached to the Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [31]. The Plaintiff specifically seeks to seal documents [31-3], [31-4], and [31-5] as they include the Plaintiff’s social security number. Because “the working presumption is that judicial records should not be sealed,” however, the Court finds that allowing the Defendant to file redacted copies of these documents would be more appropriate. Binh Hoa Le v. Exeter Finance Corp., 990 F.3d 410, 418-20 (5th Cir. 2021). Accordingly, the Defendant is instructed to contact the Clerk’s Office this same day for instructions on replacing documents [31- 3], [31-4], and [31-5] with redacted copies. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Plaintiff’s Motion to Seal [37] documents [31-3], [31-4], and [31-5] is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike [37] documents [31-21] and [31-24] pursuant to Rule 37(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is TAKEN UNDER ADVISEMENT. This, the 17th day of February, 2023.

___________________________ TAYLOR B. McNEEL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FORT THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION

EUGENIA WHITE PLAINTIFF

v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:21-cv-190-TBM-RPM

KEESLER FEDERAL CREDIT UNION DEFENDANT

ORDER Now before the Court is the Plaintiff’s Motion to Seal and to Strike [37] certain documents attached to the Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [31]. The Plaintiff specifically seeks to seal documents [31-3], [31-4], and [31-5] as they include the Plaintiff’s social security number. Because “the working presumption is that judicial records should not be sealed,” however, the Court finds that allowing the Defendant to file redacted copies of these documents would be more appropriate. Binh Hoa Le v. Exeter Finance Corp., 990 F.3d 410, 418-20 (5th Cir. 2021). Accordingly, the Defendant is instructed to contact the Clerk’s Office this same day for instructions on replacing documents [31- 3], [31-4], and [31-5] with redacted copies. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Plaintiff’s Motion to Seal [37] documents [31-3], [31-4], and [31-5] is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike [37] documents [31-21] and [31-24] pursuant to Rule 37(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is TAKEN UNDER ADVISEMENT. This, the 17th day of February, 2023.

___________________________ TAYLOR B. McNEEL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

White v. Keesler Federal Credit Union, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/white-v-keesler-federal-credit-union-mssd-2023.