White v. Johnson

CourtDistrict Court, D. Nevada
DecidedNovember 2, 2021
Docket2:21-cv-01800
StatusUnknown

This text of White v. Johnson (White v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
White v. Johnson, (D. Nev. 2021).

Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA

4 TROY WHITE, Case No. 2:21-cv-01800-GMN-VCF

5 Petitioner, ORDER 6 v.

7 CALVIN JOHNSON, et al., 8 Respondents. 9 10 11 This action is a petition for writ of habeas corpus by Troy White, an individual 12 incarcerated at Nevada’s High Desert State Prison. The Court received White’s habeas 13 petition (ECF No. 1-1), along with an application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 14 1) and a motion for appointment of counsel (ECF No. 1-2), on September 29, 2021. In 15 an order entered on October 1, 2021 (ECF No. 3), the Court denied White’s application 16 to proceed in forma pauperis and ordered him to pay the filing fee. White paid the filing 17 fee on November 1, 2021 (ECF No. 4). 18 Therefore, the Court has examined White’s habeas petition pursuant to Rule 4 of 19 the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. The Court will order the petition served on 20 the respondents. 21 White filed, with his petition, a motion for appointment of counsel (ECF 22 No. 1-2). “Indigent state prisoners applying for habeas corpus relief are not entitled to 23 appointed counsel unless the circumstances of a particular case indicate that appointed 24 counsel is necessary to prevent due process violations.” Chaney v. Lewis, 801 F.2d 25 1191, 1196 (9th Cir. 1986) (citing Kreiling v. Field, 431 F.2d 638, 640 (9th Cir. 1970) 26 (per curiam). The court may, however, appoint counsel “if the interests of justice so 27 require.” See 18 U.S.C. § 3006A; see also Rule 8(c), Rules Governing § 2254 Cases; 1 Chaney, 801 F.2d at 1196. The Court determines that, in the interests of justice, 2 appointment of counsel is warranted in this case. 3 IT IS THERFORE ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to separately 4 file the petition for writ of habeas corpus (ECF No. 1-1), and the motion for appointment 5 of counsel (ECF No. 1-2). 6 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner’s Motion for Appointment of Counsel 7 (ECF No. 1-4) is GRANTED. The Federal Public Defender for the District of Nevada 8 (FPD) is appointed to represent the petitioner. If the FPD is unable to represent the 9 petitioner due to a conflict of interest or other reason, then alternate counsel will be 10 appointed. In either case, counsel will represent the petitioner in all federal-court 11 proceedings relating to this matter, unless allowed to withdraw. 12 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to 13 electronically serve upon the FPD a copy of this order, together with a copy of the 14 petition for writ of habeas corpus (ECF No. 1-1). 15 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the FPD will have 30 days from the date of this 16 order to file a notice of appearance, or to indicate to the Court its inability to represent 17 the petitioner in this case. 18 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to add Aaron 19 Ford, Attorney General of the State of Nevada, as counsel for Respondents and to 20 provide Respondents an electronic copy of all items previously filed in this case by 21 regenerating the Notice of Electronic Filing to the office of the Attorney General only. 22 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the respondents will have 30 days from the date 23 of this order to appear in this action. Respondents will not be required to respond to the 24 habeas petition at this time. 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 1 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court will establish a schedule for further 2 proceedings in this action after counsel appear for the petitioner and the respondents. 3 4 DATED THIS __2___ day of ______N_o__v_e_m_b_e_r_ _______, 2021.

6 GLORIA M. NAVARRO 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Leo F. Kreiling v. H. v. Field
431 F.2d 638 (Ninth Circuit, 1970)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
White v. Johnson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/white-v-johnson-nvd-2021.