White v. Johnson

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

White v. Johnson

34 Ky. 595, 4 Dana 595, 1836 Ky. LEXIS 130

DecidedNovember 3, 1836

StatusPublished

This text of 34 Ky. 595 (White v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

White v. Johnson, 34 Ky. 595, 4 Dana 595, 1836 Ky. LEXIS 130 (Ky. Ct. App. 1836).

Pincite

Opinion

Chief Justice Robertson

delivered the Opinion of the Court.

When a party sues in Equity on a lost or defaced joint obligation, he should make all who may be liable defendants to his bill: and even though some of the obligors shall have died, he should join their personal representatives with the survivors; because Equity is opposed to circuity and multiplicity of litigation, and delights in distributing at once an equal burthen among all who should contribute to discharge it.

And therefore, without considering other objections to the bill in this case, as it was filed against the surviving obligors only, and suggests no.reason for omitting the representatives of those alleged to be dead—the Circuit Court, on that ground, had .there been no other, did right in sustaining the demurrer, and dismissing the bill without prejudice.

Wherefore, the decree is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chief Justice Robertson

delivered the Opinion of the Court.

When a party sues in Equity on a lost or defaced joint obligation, he should make all who may be liable defendants to his bill: and even though some of the obligors shall have died, he should join their personal representatives with the survivors; because Equity is opposed to circuity and multiplicity of litigation, and delights in distributing at once an equal burthen among all who should contribute to discharge it.

And therefore, without considering other objections to the bill in this case, as it was filed against the surviving obligors only, and suggests no.reason for omitting the representatives of those alleged to be dead—the Circuit Court, on that ground, had .there been no other, did right in sustaining the demurrer, and dismissing the bill without prejudice.

Wherefore, the decree is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

34 Ky. 595, 4 Dana 595, 1836 Ky. LEXIS 130, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/white-v-johnson-kyctapp-1836.