White v. Jensen
This text of 182 P.2d 139 (White v. Jensen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Mr. Justice Stone did not participate in the hearing or in the consideration of this cause. Mr. Justice Jackson, Mr. Justice Hays, and Mr. Justice Alter are of the opinion that the judgment should be affirmed, whereas Mr. Chief Justice Burke, Mr. Justice Hilliard and Mr. Justice Luxford are of the opinion that it should be reversed. The judgment must therefore be affirmed by operation of law because of an equally divided court, and no good purpose would be served by a statement of the issues or the reasons for the conclusion of the several members of the court. Rule 118 (f), R.C.P. Colo.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
182 P.2d 139, 116 Colo. 378, 1947 Colo. LEXIS 326, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/white-v-jensen-colo-1947.