White v. Jensen

182 P.2d 139, 116 Colo. 378, 1947 Colo. LEXIS 326
Supreme Court of Colorado·Decided May 19, 1947·No. No. 15,568.·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Mr. Justice Stone did not participate in the hearing or in the consideration of this cause. Mr. Justice Jackson, Mr. Justice Hays, and Mr. Justice Alter are of the opinion that the judgment should be affirmed, whereas Mr. Chief Justice Burke, Mr. Justice Hilliard and Mr. Justice Luxford are of the opinion that it should be reversed. The judgment must therefore be affirmed by operation of law because of an equally divided court, and no good purpose would be served by a statement of the issues or the reasons for the conclusion of the several members of the court. Rule 118 (f), R.C.P. Colo.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

White v. Jensen, 182 P.2d 139, 116 Colo. 378, 1947 Colo. LEXIS 326 (Colo. 1947).

182 P.2d 139 (White v. Jensen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.