White v. Hugh Lynch & Co.
26 Tex. 195
Opinion
We are of opinion that the court below did not err in overruling the exception to the affidavit upon which the writ of garnishment issued. We are, also, of opinion that the answer of Mrs. Elizabeth Gillard showed that the property in controversy was community property, and that there is no error in the judgment. The case is decided upon the authority of the case of De Blane v. Lynch, 23d Tex. R., p. 25.
Judgment affirmed..
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
White v. Hugh Lynch & Co., 26 Tex. 195 (Tex. 1862).
26 Tex. 195 (White v. Hugh Lynch & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
McElwee v. McElwee
911 S.W.2d 182 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1995)
Vallone v. Vallone
644 S.W.2d 455 (Texas Supreme Court, 1982)
Norris v. Vaughan
260 S.W.2d 676 (Texas Supreme Court, 1953)
Stephens v. Stephens
292 S.W. 290 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1927)
Marion MacH. Foundry & Supply Co. v. Central Motor Co.
285 S.W. 933 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1926)
Hulshizer v. First State Bank of Robstown
245 S.W. 726 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1922)
In re Estate of Foster
4 Coffey 33 (California Superior Court, San Francisco County, 1909)
Hayden v. McMillan, Devine & Howard
23 S.W. 430 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1893)
Stringfellow v. Sorrells
18 S.W. 689 (Texas Supreme Court, 1891)
Carter Bros. v. Wise County Coal Co.
2 Wilson 166 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1884)
Holland v. Seward
1 White & W. 530 (Texas Commission of Appeals, 1880)