White v. Hudson River Insurance

15 How. Pr. 288
New York Supreme Court·Decided October 15, 1854·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Roosevelt, Justice.

Policies of insurance, where there has been no fraud, and no misrepresentation or concealment of any circumstance materially enhancing the risk, are to be construed liberally. Technical objections involving no substantial right, are to be overlooked. While the underwriter fairly receives his premium, the insured should as fairly receive his protection. It is the interest alike of both, that the business of insurance should be conducted—and should be universally understood to be conducted—upon the broadest principles of fair and liberal dealing, never strangling justice in the nets of form.

Judgment for plaintiff.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

White v. Hudson River Insurance, 15 How. Pr. 288 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1854).

15 How. Pr. 288 (White v. Hudson River Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Paul v. . Travelers' Ins. Co.
20 N.E. 347 (New York Court of Appeals, 1889)