White v. Hayden's Adm'r

8 Ky. Op. 498, 1875 Ky. LEXIS 197
CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky
DecidedOctober 5, 1875
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 8 Ky. Op. 498 (White v. Hayden's Adm'r) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
White v. Hayden's Adm'r, 8 Ky. Op. 498, 1875 Ky. LEXIS 197 (Ky. Ct. App. 1875).

Opinion

Opinion by

Judge Cofer:

The agreement alleged to have been made in regard to a credit for commissions was entered into, if at all, at the time the note, which was the basis of the judgment, was given, and any defense the appellant had on account of that agreement, arose before the judgment sought to be enjoined was rendered. The case, therefore, falls directly within the provisions of Sec. 14, Civil Code.

The allegation, that the judgment was obtained by fraud seems to be based alone on the alleged fact that the appellee sued and took a judgment for more than was due him. This is no ground for vacating a judgment. It is not enough that the claim sued upon was false. Fraud to vitiate a judgment must relate to the manner in which it was obtained, and not to the foundation upon which it rests.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

City of Hickman v. First Nat. Bk. of New York
211 S.W.2d 801 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1948)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
8 Ky. Op. 498, 1875 Ky. LEXIS 197, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/white-v-haydens-admr-kyctapp-1875.