White v. Harris

1 Cal. Unrep. 40
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 18, 1856
DocketNo. 1277
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Cal. Unrep. 40 (White v. Harris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
White v. Harris, 1 Cal. Unrep. 40 (Cal. 1856).

Opinion

HEYDENFELDT, J.

— There is no equity in the complainant’s bill. If the judgment of the justice is coram non judiee, the seizure of the complainant’s property to satisfy it will be a trespass, for which he has a remedy at law.

Let the bill be dismissed.

We concur: Murray, C. J.; Terry, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Cal. Unrep. 40, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/white-v-harris-cal-1856.