White v. Hammond
4 S.E. 102, 79 Ga. 182
Opinion
This case presents no legal question, simply a question of fact; and we dispose of it in this brief summary as a complete opinion:
The credit of witnesses is for the jury. If the jury believed the plaintiff’s witnesses, the verdict was not without evidence to support it. In construing and applying testimony, reasonable inferences and deductions may be made, and conclusions may be reached that lie quite beyond the mere letter of the evidence.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
White v. Hammond, 4 S.E. 102, 79 Ga. 182 (Ga. 1887).
4 S.E. 102 (White v. Hammond) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Doyle v. RST Construction Specialty, Inc.
648 S.E.2d 664 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2007)
Ginn v. Morgan
167 S.E.2d 393 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1969)
Edwards v. Employers Mutual Liability Insurance
132 S.E.2d 39 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1963)
MacOn Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Chancey
114 S.E.2d 517 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1960)
Armour Company v. Gulley
6 S.E.2d 165 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1939)
Rikimatsu Kawamura v. Honek
16 P.2d 150 (California Court of Appeal, 1932)
Powell v. State
29 S.E. 309 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1897)