White v. Griggs

7 N.W. 125, 54 Iowa 650
Supreme Court of Iowa·Decided October 22, 1880·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Adams, Cu. J.

i. receiver : crops! b ' The mortgagor had a light to the possession of the premises until the expiration of a year from the time of sale upon foreclosure. During that time he bad a right to the crops grown upon the premises.. The mortgagee had no more interest in them than he had in crops grown upon land not mortgaged to him.

The fact that a debtor has fraudulently disposed of property upon which the creditor had no lien does not give the creditor a right to a receiver to take possession of other property upon which he has no lien. lie can have a receiver only of property upon which he has a lien, and then only when there is danger of its being lost or materially injured or impaired. Code, § 2903; Myton v. Davenport, 51 Iowa, 583. We think the plaintiff’s petition showed no sufficient ground for the appointment of a receiver, and his application should have been denied.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

White v. Griggs, 7 N.W. 125, 54 Iowa 650 (iowa 1880).

7 N.W. 125 (White v. Griggs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Carlquist v. Colthays
248 P. 481 (Utah Supreme Court, 1926)
Gilbert v. Berry
190 Iowa 351 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1920)
Vaughan v. Walton
52 S.W. 437 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1899)
West v. Conant
34 P. 705 (California Supreme Court, 1893)
American Investment Co. v. Farrar
54 N.W. 361 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1893)
Clark v. Raymond
53 N.W. 354 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1892)
Maish v. Bird
48 F. 607 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Iowa, 1882)