White v. Goodson Type Casting & Setting Machine Co.

New York Supreme Court

White v. Goodson Type Casting & Setting Machine Co.

34 N.Y.S. 797, 68 N.Y. St. Rep. 719

DecidedMay 15, 1895

StatusPublished

This text of 34 N.Y.S. 797 (White v. Goodson Type Casting & Setting Machine Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

White v. Goodson Type Casting & Setting Machine Co., 34 N.Y.S. 797, 68 N.Y. St. Rep. 719 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1895).

Pincite

Opinion

BEEKMAN, J.

This motion is made to vacate an attachment granted against the defendant, as a foreign corporation, on the ground that the damages are indefinite and uncertain, and incapable of ascertainment, upon the face of the papers. The plaintiffs sue to recover commissions on the sale by them of the stock of the defendant There was no agreement as to the amount of their compensation. They sue, therefore, to recovér the reasonable value of their services, and allege that the customary charge or commission for such services is 20 per cent, upon the cash value of the stock. In the complaint this averment is made on information and belief. In the affidavit which is made by one of the plaintiffs, the averment is made on his belief only. Nowhere do the papers disclose the sources of information upon which any such belief is predicated, nor is there any affidavit, on the part of any one qualified to testify to the fact, that such a commission is either customary or reasonable. The percentage seems to be so exorbitant and unreasonable as to furnish the court with no measure of value from which it may be reasonably inferred that, if the plaintiffs should establish their right to recover, the jury would award them the amount they claim, or anything in any way approaching it. The case, therefore, is one which, in my opinion, comes within the decisions denying the right of a party to an attachment in cases where, upon the papers, the amount of the damages is largely conjectural. For this reason the attachment should be vacated. I do not think, either, that, when the defendant moved for an increase of security on the part of the plaintiffs, it exhausted its right to make any further motion under section 682 of the Code. Order signed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BEEKMAN, J.

This motion is made to vacate an attachment granted against the defendant, as a foreign corporation, on the ground that the damages are indefinite and uncertain, and incapable of ascertainment, upon the face of the papers. The plaintiffs sue to recover commissions on the sale by them of the stock of the defendant There was no agreement as to the amount of their compensation. They sue, therefore, to recovér the reasonable value of their services, and allege that the customary charge or commission for such services is 20 per cent, upon the cash value of the stock. In the complaint this averment is made on information and belief. In the affidavit which is made by one of the plaintiffs, the averment is made on his belief only. Nowhere do the papers disclose the sources of information upon which any such belief is predicated, nor is there any affidavit, on the part of any one qualified to testify to the fact, that such a commission is either customary or reasonable. The percentage seems to be so exorbitant and unreasonable as to furnish the court with no measure of value from which it may be reasonably inferred that, if the plaintiffs should establish their right to recover, the jury would award them the amount they claim, or anything in any way approaching it. The case, therefore, is one which, in my opinion, comes within the decisions denying the right of a party to an attachment in cases where, upon the papers, the amount of the damages is largely conjectural. For this reason the attachment should be vacated. I do not think, either, that, when the defendant moved for an increase of security on the part of the plaintiffs, it exhausted its right to make any further motion under section 682 of the Code. Order signed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

34 N.Y.S. 797, 68 N.Y. St. Rep. 719, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/white-v-goodson-type-casting-setting-machine-co-nysupct-1895.