White v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

White v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.

213 S.E.2d 539, 134 Ga. App. 159, 1975 Ga. App. LEXIS 1943

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided March 4, 1975·No. 50333·Published

Opinion

Deen, Presiding Judge.

1. Under the decisions in Pike v. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp., 125 Ga. App. 83 (2) (186 SE2d 482) and Leach v. Midland-Guardian Co., 127 Ga. App. 562 (194 SE2d 260), the finance charges on this time price sale of an automobile (including insurance premiums) was not usurious.

2. So far as this record shows, no objection was entered by the appellant to the holding of a foreclosure hearing by the court without a jury, and the question cannot be raised on appeal for the first time. Chappell v. Small, 194 Ga. 143 (2) (20 SE2d 916).

Judgment affirmed.

Evans and Stolz, JJ., concur. Rogers, Magruder & Hoyt, Karl M. Kothe, for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Deen, Presiding Judge.

1. Under the decisions in Pike v. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp., 125 Ga. App. 83 (2) (186 SE2d 482) and Leach v. Midland-Guardian Co., 127 Ga. App. 562 (194 SE2d 260), the finance charges on this time price sale of an automobile (including insurance premiums) was not usurious.

2. So far as this record shows, no objection was entered by the appellant to the holding of a foreclosure hearing by the court without a jury, and the question cannot be raised on appeal for the first time. Chappell v. Small, 194 Ga. 143 (2) (20 SE2d 916).

Judgment affirmed.

Evans and Stolz, JJ., concur. Rogers, Magruder & Hoyt, Karl M. Kothe, for appellee.

White v. General Motors Acceptance Corp., 213 S.E.2d 539, 134 Ga. App. 159, 1975 Ga. App. LEXIS 1943 (Ga. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

213 S.E.2d 539 (White v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related