White v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.
This text of 213 S.E.2d 539 (White v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. Under the decisions in Pike v. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp., 125 Ga. App. 83 (2) (186 SE2d 482) and Leach v. Midland-Guardian Co., 127 Ga. App. 562 (194 SE2d 260), the finance charges on this time price sale of an automobile (including insurance premiums) was not usurious.
2. So far as this record shows, no objection was entered by the appellant to the holding of a foreclosure hearing by the court without a jury, and the question cannot be raised on appeal for the first time. Chappell v. Small, 194 Ga. 143 (2) (20 SE2d 916).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
213 S.E.2d 539, 134 Ga. App. 159, 1975 Ga. App. LEXIS 1943, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/white-v-general-motors-acceptance-corp-gactapp-1975.