White v. Gabrielli

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

White v. Gabrielli

272 A.D.2d 469, 707 N.Y.S.2d 505, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5554

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 15, 2000

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 272 A.D.2d 469 (White v. Gabrielli) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

White v. Gabrielli, 272 A.D.2d 469, 707 N.Y.S.2d 505, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5554 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Golar, J.), dated February 9, 1999, which denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

On August 22, 1993, the plaintiff tripped and fell backward over a wheel stop as she exited her car in a rooftop parking lot owned by the defendant. It is undisputed that the wheel stop was not anchored to the floor of the parking lot. The defendant asserts that he is not negligent, as a matter of law, because the wheel stop was clearly visible.

[470]*470The defendant’s failure to anchor the wheel stop to the floor of the parking lot was a violation of his statutory duties (see, Administrative Code of City of NY §§ 27-128 [safe maintenance], 27-454 [roof storage of motor vehicles]), and the plaintiff submitted evidence sufficient to raise an issue of fact as to whether this violation created a dangerous condition which caused her to trip and fall (see, Hilaire v Stanley Mgt. Co., 229 AD2d 423). The defendant also had a common-law duty to maintain the parking lot in a reasonably safe condition so as to prevent foreseeable accidents (see, Basso v Miller, 40 NY2d 233). The plaintiff’s failure to avoid the wheel stop raises an issue of comparative negligence (see, Saiia v State of New York, 190 AD2d 1059). Goldstein, J. P., Florio, Feuerstein and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Golar, J.), dated February 9, 1999, which denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

On August 22, 1993, the plaintiff tripped and fell backward over a wheel stop as she exited her car in a rooftop parking lot owned by the defendant. It is undisputed that the wheel stop was not anchored to the floor of the parking lot. The defendant asserts that he is not negligent, as a matter of law, because the wheel stop was clearly visible.

[470]*470The defendant’s failure to anchor the wheel stop to the floor of the parking lot was a violation of his statutory duties (see, Administrative Code of City of NY §§ 27-128 [safe maintenance], 27-454 [roof storage of motor vehicles]), and the plaintiff submitted evidence sufficient to raise an issue of fact as to whether this violation created a dangerous condition which caused her to trip and fall (see, Hilaire v Stanley Mgt. Co., 229 AD2d 423). The defendant also had a common-law duty to maintain the parking lot in a reasonably safe condition so as to prevent foreseeable accidents (see, Basso v Miller, 40 NY2d 233). The plaintiff’s failure to avoid the wheel stop raises an issue of comparative negligence (see, Saiia v State of New York, 190 AD2d 1059). Goldstein, J. P., Florio, Feuerstein and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

272 A.D.2d 469, 707 N.Y.S.2d 505, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5554, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/white-v-gabrielli-nyappdiv-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack