White v. Francis
This text of White v. Francis (White v. Francis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7516
WALTER DUANE WHITE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JOYCE FRANCIS, Warden; VALORIE RAPPOLD, A.W. Operations; MATT ARNOLD, Captain; SLIGER, Lt. Security; DEBORAH LIVINGSTON, Disciplinary Hearing Officer (D.H.O.); WILSON, Assistant Food Service Administrator; MRS. VELTYRY, A-Unit Manager (Coordinator Job Assignments); MARK DIB, Lt., Physicians Assistant; MRS. FRYE, Food Service Correctional Officer; MRS. HILTON, Food Service Correctional Officer; ROBERT SPEARS,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS; FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, GILMER,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, District Judge. (1:07-cv-00032-IMK-JSK)
Submitted: April 22, 2009 Decided: May 13, 2009
Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Walter Duane White, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2 PER CURIAM:
Walter Duane White appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown
Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we deny White’s motion for appointment of counsel
and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
White v. Francis, No. 1:07-cv-00032-IMK-JSK, 2008 WL 2705102
(N.D. W. Va. July 9, 2008). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
White v. Francis, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/white-v-francis-ca4-2009.