White v. Fortune

6 Blackf. 116
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 15, 1841
StatusPublished

This text of 6 Blackf. 116 (White v. Fortune) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
White v. Fortune, 6 Blackf. 116 (Ind. 1841).

Opinion

Black FORD, J.

J.— White sued Fortune before a justice of the peace, and on the 6th of November, 1840, obtained a judgment. The defendant appealed to the Circuit Court, and filed an appeal-bond on the 13th of the same month. The justice, on the 27th of the same month, filed in the clerk’s office the transcript, appeal-bond, cause of action, &c. The justice’s' transcript does not contain the cause of action, nor state that one had been filed. There was, however,- a good cause of action filed in the clerk’s office with the transcript. The parties appeared in the Circuit Court, and the Court, on the appellant’s motion, dismissed the suit.

We see no good reason for this judgment of dismissal. It is decided, that the transcript of the record of the Circuit Court should show that a sufficient cause of action had been filed. Bell v. Trotter, 4 Blackf., 12. But we do not think *that the cause of action filed with the justice need be copied or referred to in the justice’s transcript.

Per Quriam.—The judgment is reversed with costs. ' Cause remanded, &c.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bell v. Trotter
4 Blackf. 12 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1835)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 Blackf. 116, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/white-v-fortune-ind-1841.