White v. FNU Smereka

410 F. App'x 714
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 10, 2011·No. No. 10-2052·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Victor B. White appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. White v. Smereka, No. 3:09-cv-00257-FDW-DCK, 2010 WL 2465552 (W.D.N.C. June 14, 2010) & (Aug. 17, 2010). Further, we deny the City of Charlotte, North Carolina’s motion to dismiss, because we find that White’s notice of appeal was timely filed. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

White v. FNU Smereka, 410 F. App'x 714 (4th Cir. 2011).

410 F. App'x 714 (White v. FNU Smereka) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

WHITE v. THE CITY OF GREENSBORO
M.D. North Carolina, 2022
White v. Smereka
181 L. Ed. 2d 299 (Supreme Court, 2011)