White v. Fischer

76 A.D.2d 1027, 907 N.Y.S.2d 689
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in White v. Fischer. Read the opinion of the Court — 87 A.D.3d 1249

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of mandamus to compel the respondents to comply with a decision and order of this Court dated November 17, 2009 (People v White, 67 AD3d 933 [2009]). Application by the petitioner to prosecute this proceeding as a poor person.

[1028]*1028Ordered that the application to prosecute this proceeding as a poor person is granted to the extent that the filing fee imposed by CPLR 8022 (b) is waived, and the application is otherwise denied; and it is further,

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.

The extraordinary remedy of mandamus will lie only to compel the performance of a ministerial act and only when there exists a clear legal right to the relief sought (see Matter of Legal Aid Socy. of Sullivan County v Scheinman, 53 NY2d 12, 16 [1981]). The petitioner has failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought. Dillon, J.P., Florio, Leventhal and Chambers, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

White v. Fischer, 76 A.D.2d 1027, 907 N.Y.S.2d 689 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

76 A.D.2d 1027 (White v. Fischer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Legal Aid Society of Sullivan County, Inc. v. Scheinman
422 N.E.2d 542 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)
People v. White
67 A.D.3d 933 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)